Is it Just a Word Game? The Dangers of Concept Creep in Family Law
Celebrity Ballroom 6, 7 & 8
Concept creep in the field of psychology refers to the semantic inflation of concepts related to the description of harm, such as violence, abuse, bullying and trauma. While the expansion of definitions of harm can identify new, previously unrecognized forms of harm (e.g., cyber bullying expanding from the concept of bullying), broadening these concepts can dilute the intent and measurement of harm concepts, conflate the etiology of harm, and trivialize more severe forms of harm. This panel will introduce concept creep from historical, psychological, and research perspectives to discuss the opportunities and challenges of mutating concepts of harm. The panel will then highlight examples of semantic inflations of harm in family law, specifically addressing trauma, domestic violence, parental alienation, gatekeeping, and attachment
Jennifer Hardesty, PhD, Urbana, IL
Michael A. Saini, PhD, Toronto, ON, Canada
Matthew J. Sullivan, PhD, Santa Cruz, CA
Peter Jaffe, PhD, London, ON, Canada
1. Cultural and Religious Factors in Custody Evaluations and Decisions
Sunset 3 & 4
This workshop presents an interdisciplinary perspective for forensic evaluators, attorneys, and psychologists about the cultural and religious issues that impact custody determinations regarding access, decision making, and possible restrictions on one parent’s conduct when having that access. The presenters will review current case law and explore fact patterns that will highlight the impact of cultural and religious factors on divorce and custody proceedings when a spouse changes the course of their beliefs during the marriage.
Martin E. Friedlander, JD, Brooklyn, NY
Alberto A. Yohananoff, PhD, New York, NY
Hon. Jane Pearl (ret.), New York, NY
2. What to Do When Your Child Doesn’t Want to Go to Their Other Parent’s Home
Celebrity 5
One of the most complicated and risky situations post-separation occurs when a child resists or refuses contact with a parent. This workshop serves as a guide to parents (for clinicians, the legal profession, and the court) on how to differentiate b etween t hose families in which parent-child contact problems are a potential problem versus when resistance is within the normal range. In this hands-on session, the presenters will develop a tool to assist parents with the identification a nd management of potential consequences and create resources to work with parent-child contact problems.
Leslie M. Drozd, PhD, Seattle, WA
Robin M. Deutsch, PhD, ABPP, Newton, MA
3. Supervised Visitation/Parenting Time: The Who, What, Why, and How
Melrose 4
Supervised visitation supports safe relationships between parents and children in family court cases that typically involve allegations and findings of domestic violence and child abuse/neglect. This workshop will explore circumstances that warrant supervised visitation, options for who will supervise and where this will occur, appropriate requirements for parents and supervisors, and considerations for determining how and when supervision can be modified or eliminated. The presenters will offer the perspectives of a judicial officer, mediator, evaluator, and parenting coordinator.
Jennifer E. Joseph, JD, Saint Paul, MN
Mindy F, Mitnick, EdM, MA, Edina, MN
Hon. James Street, Saint Paul, MN
4. Ethics of Hybrid and Online Dispute Resolution with Self-Represented Litigants
Melrose 1 & 2
Ethical considerations are the cornerstone of fair and effective dispute resolution processes. The switch to virtual, online, and hybrid dispute resolution models have added new ethical considerations and traps for the dispute resolution practitioner. Add in the twist of working with self-represented litigants and the ethical minefield becomes even more precarious. The presenters will explore common dilemmas and facilitate a lively discussion about potential resolutions.
Handouts will be distributed in the room
Hon. Michael Rust, Oshkosh, WI
Jean Sternlight, JD, Las Vegas, NV
5. Preventing Serious Child Mental Health Crises in Divorcing Families
Sunset 5 & 6
The incidence of serious mental health crises in children and teens has been declared a national emergency by the Surgeon General. The risk is greater for divorcing families. A new online program for parents and their children teaches evidence-based stress reduction methods. Children’s attention is fostered by seven different child hosts who interact with a wise, kind, animated alien, Orby. Preliminary evidence shows reductions in children’s stress, anxiety, depression and school behavior problems. Other treatments and preventive approaches for child depression and anxiety will be summarized.
Handouts will be distributed in the room
Donald A. Gordon, PhD, Ashland, OR
6. Preparation is Not a Gamble: Tips for Effective Testimony in Child Custody Cases
Melrose 3
All too often mental health professionals do not fully understand the rules of evidence, and the advocacy roles of attorneys. Similarly, attorneys often do not understand the child custody evaluation process, how testing can be utilized, and the basis upon which mental health professionals formulate opinions and recommendations. In this session, a seasoned attorney and a seasoned mental health professional will offer a primer for what each role needs to know about the other, and will share best practices for greater efficacy when preparing for, and testifying in the courtroom.
No handouts
Lawrence Jay Braunstein, JD, White Plains, NY
Sol R. Rappaport, PhD, ABPP, Libertyville, IL
Rapport, Emotion, and Credibility in the Zoom Room
Celebrity Ballroom 6, 7 & 8
Use of videoconferencing and other technology seems to have overtaken family law, potentially introducing more efficiency into mediation, custody evaluations, court hearings, and other processes. But what is the impact of switching from in-person communication to videoconferencing or other technology in terms of emotions, rapport, credibility assessments, focus, fatigue, and other factors? How can professionals both select and design the most appropriate forum? Professor Sternlight will share insights from her research on the psychology of alternative communication technologies.
Professor Jean Sternlight, Univ. of Nevada, William S. Boyd School of Law, Las Vegas, NV
7. Diversity and the Revised AFCC Guidelines: Why One Size Does Not Fit All
Sunset 5 & 6
The new AFCC Guidelines for Conducting Parenting Plan Evaluations include multiple references to the importance of considering and understanding issues of diversity. Parenting plan evaluators must approach each new appointment with sensitivity to diversity and a willingness to learn what is important to the family from a cultural perspective. The information in this workshop will enhance the skill level and knowledge needed for evaluators to do so, and also benefit the families receiving parenting plan evaluations.
April Harris-Britt, PhD, Durham, NC
Andrea Jones, MSW, RSW, Toronto, ON, Canada
8. Mediation for Unrepresented Parents
Melrose 1 & 2
Is successful mediation dependent on legal representation? Does the fundamental nature of mediation, and the mediator’s role and ethical responsibility change if parents are unrepresented? Is it expected that presentation, participation, and understanding of mediation may be different for unrepresented parents? Is mediation inclusion dependent on representation? This interactive, reflective, and cognitive skills-based session will use scenarios, examples, and discussion to explore these questions.
No handouts
Hon. Nancy Flatters, (Ret.), Calgary, AB, Canada
Larry S. Fong, PhD, Calgary, AB, Canada
9. Stop the Madness: Avoiding Adverse Childhood Experiences and Other Maladies
Melrose 4
Must every separation result in ongoing parental conflict, as well as damage to children? Too often, family law professionals intervene too late and struggle to mitigate damage after the process has devolved into litigation. What can we as professionals do prophylactically to avoid or limit the damage to parents and children? This workshop explores how to support early intervention in the separation process, how to use resources such as therapists, mediators, and parenting plan coordinators before litigation ensues, and how to better educate parents and those who work with families in crisis about the multitude of adverse childhood consequences that result from ongoing conflict and litigation.
Michael J. Kretzmer, JD, Angeles, CA
Susan Rempel, PhD, El Segundo, CA
Hon. Mark A. Juhas, Los Angeles, CA
10. Integrated Responses to Complex Families
Melrose 3
High-conflict cases use considerable court time and are stressful for all parties involved, including the professionals. These cases can take on a circular pattern, returning to court repeatedly, and there may be multiple assessments and various problems with the implementation of therapeutic interventions. This presentation will examine interdisciplinarian issues within the court process through the lens of a judge, an assessor, and a therapist, and what each of these roles needs from one another to better serve these complex cases.
Alyson G. Jones, MA, RCC, West Vancouver, BC, Canada
Hon. Patricia M. Bond, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Rebecca St. Clere England, PhD, RPsych, Vancouver, BC, Canada
11. My Child Hates Me: Research and Recommendations on Parent-Child Estrangement
Celebrity 5
Resist/refuse dynamics in families are challenging to legal and mental health profes- sionals while overwhelming the court system. The presenters conducted a qualitative research study on the experiences of parents who are estranged from their child(ren) to identify how to best help families with these dynamics. In this workshop, the research findings will be presented and the application of findings will be explored. The present- ers will also discuss helpful factors for the relationship repair process, how to keep a systemic approach, and what professionals need to know when they have a client with a resist/refuse family system.
Erin Guyette, MS, Saint Paul, MN
Steven M. Harris, MA, PhD, Saint Paul, MN
12. The Neuroscience Revolution and the Family Court
Sunset 3 & 4
This cutting edge session will focus on the use of neuroscience in family court, including brain scans, the value of neuroscientific evidence, critical evaluation of science-related evidence, and limitations. Emerging neuroscience topics relevant to family court will also be discussed alongside Daubert considerations.
No handouts
Stephanie Tabashneck, PsyD, JD, Newton, MA
Hon. Linda Fidnick, Northampton, MA Fidnick, Northampton, MA
13. The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Court-Involved Children
Melrose 3
Children with court involvement have often encountered adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and are mistrustful of court professionals, as they are uncertain as to what information will be shared and with whom. This presentation will explore the effects of ACEs and court involvement on children’s resistance and mistrust when interacting with court professionals. Emphasis will be given to cultural humility in the trust-building process and providing trauma informed care to ensure that children feel comfortable making disclosures that are necessary when making recommendations and decisions in their best interest.
Ruth Ouzts Moore, PhD, Savannah, GA
Susan J. Foster, PhD, Hammond, LA
Jaymie VanMeter, PhD, Chicago, IL
14. Crafting Parenting Plans that Address the Unique Cultural Dynamics of a Family
Sunset 5 & 6
While education is the key to recognizing the implicit biases that may impact our view of families involved in the custody dispute resolution process, this workshop provides attendees with methods of recognizing and interrupting when our responses to a situation are based on stereotypes and limited exposure. In addition, the presenters will provide concrete interventions for use in parenting plans around racial, ethnic, religious and identity issues that arise with families.
Handouts will be distributed in the room
Dawn Smith, JD, Tucker, GA
Daniel Bloom, JD, Atlanta, GA
15. Looking Inward: Recognizing and Overcoming Our Biases
Sunset 3 & 4
Family court practitioners are not immune from biases related to age, gender, race, and other identities, though we may not always be aware of these biases or their influence on our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. When hidden biases remain unrecognized and unaddressed, they have the potential to compromise the services we provide to children, youth, and families. This workshop will provide an overview of the psychological literature on explicit and implicit biases, empirically supported methods for minimizing their impact, and the limitations of these methods. Personal reflection will be encouraged.
Per presenters request handouts will be uploaded after the conference
Lindsey Sank Davis, PhD, Brookline, MA
16. Child Custody Assessment: New Professional Perspectives from Research
Celebrity 5
This session is based on insights from recent research on child custody assessment (CCA). The main pitfalls observed in CCA identified through the analysis of 45 complaint files to a psychology licensing board will be described. Individual and group interviews with law and mental health professionals highlight the role of CCA in giving a voice to children and supporting conflict resolution. Communication challenges for professionals, as well as the shortage of professionals are also discussed. All of these results will support reflections about the promotion of best professional practices.
Karine Poitras, PhD, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
Julie Maheux, PhD, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
Arianne Marois, BA, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
17. Affairs and Their Impact on Co-Parenting and Parent-Child Relationships
Melrose 4
This presentation will explore extramarital affairs and their impact on the divorce process. A focus upon the co-parenting relationship both during and after divorce will include issues of trust, ability to communicate and make child-focused decisions, and the development of custody and parenting plans. The possible impact on children and the parent-child relationships will also be explored, including any contributions to parent-child contact problems.
Tamsen Thorpe, PhD, Morristown, NJ
Sharon Ryan Montgomery, PsyD, Morristown, NJ
Marcy A. Pasternak , PhD, Watchung, NJ
18. Conducting Homes Studies Virtually: Developments in Puerto Rico
Melrose 1 & 2
This workshop will focus on how conducting home studies are reinvented virtually for relocation cases. A proposed model for conducting virtual home studies for evaluating the proposed jurisdiction by the moving parent will be presented using Puerto Rico as context. The model is based on social capital perspective, specifically the ecological comparison component under the Bronfenbrenner’s Ecosystem Framework. Participants will be able to picture how the ecological comparison component can be operationalized through public governmental available apps.
Paul-Jesús Fericelli, PhD, San Juan, PR